February 1, 2006

Lemon Law Victories Against Fleetwood Motorhomes

99% of all lemon law cases are resolved in out-of-court settlements. However, on occasion, a manufacturer will refuse reasonable settlement offers and decide to roll the dice in a jury trial. Fleetwood Motor Homes in particular has adopted a strategy of not settling RV lemon law cases perhaps on the theory the strategy would discourage owners from filing suit under the lemon law in the first place. That strategy is not working all that well. Just in the last four years, our law firm's clients have prevailed in the following Fleetwood cases:

Sanbeck v Fleetwood Motor homes, Civil No. 68541 (Nevada County Superior Court)
In 2003, the jury awarded the Sanbecks their actual damages of $49,866 and a civil penalty of $10,000 against Fleetwood Motor homes. In addition, Fleetwood was ordered to pay the attorney's fees.

Harvill v Fleetwood Motorhomes, Civil No. 315725 (San Francisco Superior Court)
In 2002, the jury awarded Ms. Harvill her actual damages of $103,500 and a civil penalty of $103,500 against Fleetwood Motor homes. Fleetwood also had to pay the attorney's fees.

Palmer v Fleetwood Motor homes, Civil No. 009496 (San Joaquin County Superior Court)
In 2001, the jury awarded the Palmers their actual damages of $87,018 and a civil penalty of $65,000 against Fleetwood Motor homes. In addition, Fleetwood was ordered to pay the attorney's fees.

September 1, 2004

Monaco RV Owners Prevail in Lemon Law Trial in Sacramento California

Monaco Coach Corporation is one the leading motor home manufacturers. In a case we tried to jury verdict in 2004 in Sacramento, Monaco argued that the fact that a mistake in the manufacturing process that resulted in a crushed heat duct to the bedroom and bath which in turn resulted in virtually no heat in those rooms was not a substantial defect. Never mind, that the owners at one point while parked at high altitude in the winter in Colorado had to sleep with their two large dogs to try to stay warm! The Superior Court jury rendered a verdict for the owners of their purchase price, interest on their loan, and incidental damages totaling $312,444 in return for the motor home. Monaco then settled the substantial KABO fee bill. Verakis v Monaco Coach Corporation, Civil No. AS05906 (Sacramento County Superior Court).