<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>The Lemon Law Blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40" title="The Lemon Law Blog" />
    <updated>2009-07-03T19:17:26Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Published by Kemnitzer, Anderson, Barron, Ogilvie &amp; Brewer, LLP</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>Consumer Groups Protest Chrysler &amp; GM Avoiding Product Liability Claims</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/07/consumer_groups_protest_chrysl.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=49571" title="Consumer Groups Protest Chrysler &amp; GM Avoiding Product Liability Claims" />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.49571</id>
    
    <published>2009-07-03T18:53:48Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-03T19:17:26Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Chrysler and GM are using the bankruptcy proceedings to bar persons injured in accidents due to defects in their vehicles. Thanks to the bankruptcy, owners injured or killed due to product defects in vehicles produced before Chrysler&apos;s bankruptcy filing are...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Chrysler and GM are using the bankruptcy proceedings to bar persons injured in accidents due to defects in their vehicles. Thanks to the bankruptcy, owners injured or killed due to product defects in vehicles produced before Chrysler's bankruptcy filing are barred from making any claims. GM agreed to consider claims related to cars manufactured before the company is sold to a new entity, so long as the accident happens after the sale is completed. Claims related to accidents that occurred before the sale will remain with the "old" GM, and, as with Chrysler, plaintiffs would recover very little, if anything.</p>

<p>A few days ago, consumer groups petitioned the Federal Trade Commission yesterday to require that Chrysler vehicles display stickers warning prospective buyers of liability risks. A KGO-TV story on this controversy is <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/7_on_your_side&id=6896687">here.</a></p>

<p>Congressman André Carson (D-Ind.) has proposed legislation that would require all automakers to purchase liability insurance if they are majority-owned by the federal government or if they have federal loans.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Chrysler Owners&apos; Lemon Law Rights Are Preserved</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/06/chrysler_owners_lemon_law_righ_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=47586" title="Chrysler Owners' Lemon Law Rights Are Preserved" />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.47586</id>
    
    <published>2009-06-10T20:18:16Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-10T20:32:55Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The new Chrysler/Fiat corporation that emerged from the bankruptcy proceeding will negotiate settlements with owners of vehicles manufactured by the old Chrysler corporation. This concession was made in response to publicity generated by consumer groups. The new company said it...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="New Chrysler/Fiat Corp" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The new Chrysler/Fiat corporation that emerged from the bankruptcy proceeding will negotiate settlements with owners of vehicles manufactured by the old Chrysler corporation. This concession was made in response to publicity generated by consumer groups. The new company said it would "recognize, honor and pay liabilities under Lemon Laws for additional repairs, refund or replacement of a defective vehicle (including reasonable attorneys' fees)." </p>

<p>New Chrysler will not pay any civil penalties under the lemon laws. It remains to be seen just how far Chrysler is willing to go in negotiating settlements. <img alt="fiat_chrysler276.jpg" src="http://www.lemonlaws.com/fiat_chrysler276.jpg" width="166" height="100" align=right /></p>

<p><br />
Persons who suffered personal injuries because of defects in Chrysler vehicles, however, are out of luck. Consumer groups and victims' petition to the U.S. Supreme Court to preserve their rights was denied on June 9, 2009. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Dealer Promises to Pay off the Loan on Your Trade-In Car &amp; then Goes out of Business, What Protection do you Have?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/05/dealer_promises_to_pay_off_the.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=46165" title="Dealer Promises to Pay off the Loan on Your Trade-In Car &amp; then Goes out of Business, What Protection do you Have?" />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.46165</id>
    
    <published>2009-05-25T17:27:03Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-25T17:47:11Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Car dealers routinely accept trade-in cars promising to pay off the existing loan as part of the deal. But what happens when the dealer goes out of business without paying off the loan? That leaves the consumer owing money on...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Buying Used Cars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Car dealers routinely accept trade-in cars promising to pay off the existing loan as part of the deal. But what happens when the dealer goes out of business without paying off the loan? That leaves the consumer owing money on the trade-in with the finance company looks to the consumer to keep paying. With many car dealers going out of business in the past year, consumers are stuck with loan payments on a car they no longer own. Some folks end up with two car payments--one on the trade-in and one on the car they bought.</p>

<p>A bill of the California Legislature, SB 95, would help deter this abuse and would add protection to victims. The bill would raise the dealer bond to $100,000 and would add a requirement that dealers pay off loans on trade-ins within a short time period.</p>

<p>KABOB client Stefanie Feliciano is a typical of persons caught in this scenario. A dealer failed to pay off the loan on a trade-in car leaving her with the loan obligation. This weekend a Sacramento TV station, KCRA, featured a story and video on Ms Feliciano and the bill, SB 95, accessible at <a href="http://www.kcra.com/money/19553191/detail.html">http://www.kcra.com/money/19553191/detail.html</a>. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Best Cars for Teen Drivers</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/05/best_cars_for_teen_drivers.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=45688" title="Best Cars for Teen Drivers" />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.45688</id>
    
    <published>2009-05-19T17:30:47Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-19T17:51:28Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Accident rates for teen age drivers are pretty appalling. An aggravating factor is that parents often give older, unsafe cars to the kids. Given their driving habits, the kids should have the safest cars. Columnist Joseph White of the Wall...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Auto Safety" />
            <category term="Buying New Cars" />
            <category term="Buying Used Cars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Accident rates for teen age drivers are pretty appalling. An aggravating factor is that parents often give older, unsafe cars to the kids. Given their driving habits, the kids should have the safest cars. Columnist Joseph White of the Wall Street Journal analyzed crash tests and reliability data to come up with recommendations for the best used cars for young drivers. In his <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB124269032164232503-lMyQjAxMDI5NDEyODYxOTgwWj.html">article</a>, White first eliminated sports cars for obvious reasons, pickups, SUVs that are prone to roll-overs, and very small cars. He looked for cars with stability control and excellent crash test results. </p>

<p>Using this criteria, among moderate priced cars, he recommends the 2004-06 Toyota Camry with the optional stability control, the 2008-09 Chevrolet Malibu, recent Ford Fusion models with stability control, and the 2006-09 Subaru Legacy. Among luxury used cars, White likes the 2003-06 Lexus ES, 2006 Audi A4 and the Prius models with stability control.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Be Cautious Buying from Dealers Going Out of Business </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/05/be_cautious_buying_from_dealer.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=45495" title="Be Cautious Buying from Dealers Going Out of Business " />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.45495</id>
    
    <published>2009-05-17T04:43:52Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-17T23:36:35Z</updated>
    
    <summary>As everyone knows, Chrysler and GM are disenfranchising thousands of car dealers. Lots of used car dealers have gone out of business because of the rescission and poor sales. When dealers go out of business, bad things can happen to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Buying New Cars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>As everyone knows, Chrysler and GM are disenfranchising thousands of car dealers. Lots of used car dealers have gone out of business because of the rescission and poor sales. When dealers go out of business, bad things can happen to buyers.<img alt="Chrtsler_Dealership_C_4400A_full-thumb-620x454.jpg" src="http://www.lemonlaws.com/Chrtsler_Dealership_C_4400A_full-thumb-620x454.jpg" width="200" height="80" /align = right></p>

<p><br />
Dealers may forget to pay off the loan on a trade-in car or to send in the paperwork for an extended warranty or a factory rebate. The dealer may promise to fix or add accessories and may not be around to follow through. </p>

<p>So--do not trade in a car if you owe money on it. Sell it yourself or pay off the loan. If a dealer promises to fix something or add an accessory, make sure the work is done <strong>before</strong> you sign a contract to buy the car. Or, if a dealer looks really shaky, buy somewhere else!</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Smart, Yaris &amp; Fit Fare Poorly in Crash Tests</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/04/smart_yaris_fit_fare_poorly_in.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=42962" title="Smart, Yaris &amp; Fit Fare Poorly in Crash Tests" />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.42962</id>
    
    <published>2009-04-16T05:35:51Z</published>
    <updated>2009-04-16T05:48:08Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety sent the Honda Fit crashing into a Honda Accord, the Smart ForTwo into a Mercedes C-Class and a Toyota Yaris into a Toyota Camry -- each at 40 miles per hour. The results indicate...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Auto Safety" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety sent the Honda Fit crashing into a Honda Accord, the Smart ForTwo into a Mercedes C-Class and a Toyota Yaris into a Toyota Camry -- each at 40 miles per hour. The <a href="http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr041409.html">results</a> indicate what safety you may be trading for efficiency when your mode of transportation shrinks.</p>

<p>The Smart For Two had “extensive” damage into the area where the driver sits. The institute's findings indicate a human would have a high likelihood of sustaining head and leg injuries. The Yaris rated poor in the area of head and leg injuries as well. A driver of the Fit in a similar accident would have hit the steering wheel through the airbag in addition to sustaining leg injuries.</p>

<p><img alt="6a00d83451e0d569e201157018f724970b.jpg" src="http://www.lemonlaws.com/6a00d83451e0d569e201157018f724970b.jpg" width="400" height="250" /><br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The tests are called "offset" crashes. The cars crash not quite head on, similar to what would result when a car strays over the center line, and the damage can easily intrude into the passenger compartment. Each of the small cars sustained damage the institute believes would lead to injuries for their occupants.</p>

<p>In a statement, Adrian Lund, president of the Arlington, Va.-based institute, said, "Though much safer than they were a few years ago, minicars as a group do a comparatively poor job of protecting people in crashes, simply because they're smaller and lighter. In collisions with bigger vehicles, the forces acting on the smaller ones are higher, and there's less distance from the front of a small car to the occupant compartment to 'ride down' the impact. These and other factors increase injury likelihood."</p>

<p><br />
Toyota’s statement said the institute's test was equal to an 80-mph collision, which was “a speed and energy higher than 99.1% of all real world crashes."</p>

<p>Honda’s statement also said the tests were done at a higher speed than most real world crashes and that, for the company, “Safety is a top priority.”</p>

<p>Institute for Highway Safety spokesman Russ Rader said that the test was not done any differently than past front crash tests, but that the automakers use the combined speeds of 40 mph on each car to come up with the 80-mph complaint. </p>

<p>"This new test is no different than others they have done in the past -- both vehicles are traveling at 40 miles per hour so the closing speed could be considered 80 miles per hour," Rader said. He added that the test configuration is exactly the same as crash test results the automakers use in their safety advertising.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>President Nominates Safety Advocate to Head NHTSA</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/04/president_nominates_safety_adv_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=42775" title="President Nominates Safety Advocate to Head NHTSA" />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.42775</id>
    
    <published>2009-04-14T05:41:11Z</published>
    <updated>2009-04-14T05:50:08Z</updated>
    
    <summary>President Obama has nominated safety advocate Charles A. Hurley to head the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Hurley has been the CEO of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) for four years. Before that Hurley was with the National Safety...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Auto Safety" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>President Obama has nominated safety advocate Charles A. Hurley to head the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Hurley has been the CEO of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) for four years. Before that Hurley was with the National Safety Council and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Having a strong safety advocate at NHTSA is indeed good news. Congress has to approve the nomination.</p>

<p>NHTSA sets safety standards for cars sold in the United States and is also responsible for regulating national average fuel economy standards. Consumer Reports blog entry on Hurley states that Hurley favors much stronger roof strength standards to prevent vehicle roofs from collapsing on occupants in rollover accidents. <br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Some SUVs Do Poorly in Roll Over Crashes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/03/some_suvs_do_poorly_in_roll_ov.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=41669" title="Some SUVs Do Poorly in Roll Over Crashes" />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.41669</id>
    
    <published>2009-03-31T05:52:16Z</published>
    <updated>2009-03-31T06:01:11Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Some SUVs did not do well in roof crush tests conducted by the Insurance Institute of America. A report in the NY Times by Chris Jensen digests the Institute&apos;s findings. Only four of the dozen small S.U.V.’s evaluated in a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Auto Safety" />
            <category term="Buying New Cars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Some SUVs did not do well in roof crush tests conducted by the Insurance Institute of America. A <a href="http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/24/some-suvs-dont-do-well-on-safety-test/">report</a> in the NY Times by Chris Jensen digests the Institute's findings.</p>

<p>Only four of the dozen small S.U.V.’s evaluated in a new test to see how well their roofs held up in a rollover crash got “good” ratings, and some of the country’s most popular models did not fare well.</p>

<p>The new Volkswagen Tiguan, Subaru Forester, the Honda Element and the Jeep Patriot received good ratings. The Suzuki Grand Vitara, Chevrolet Equinox (and Pontiac Torrent), the Toyota RAV4, the Nissan Rogue and the Mitsubishi Outlander received acceptable ratings.</p>

<p>The popular Ford Escape/Mercury Mariner/Mazda Tribute triplets and Honda’s CR-V got marginal ratings. The worst-performing models were the Kia Sportage and its sibling the Hyundai Tucson, which got poor ratings.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Government to Guarantee GM &amp; Chrysler Warranties </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/03/government_to_guarantee_gm_chr.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=41663" title="Government to Guarantee GM &amp; Chrysler Warranties " />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.41663</id>
    
    <published>2009-03-31T05:13:18Z</published>
    <updated>2009-03-31T05:48:24Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A Consumer Reports survey found that more than three-quarters (78 percent) of respondents said they were unlikely to consider buying a new car from an automaker in bankruptcy; 64 percent were very unlikely. Further, more than eight in 10 respondents...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Buying New Cars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A Consumer Reports <a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2009/03/car-buyers-hesitant-to-buy-from-bankrupt-automakers.html">survey</a> found that more than three-quarters (78 percent) of respondents said they were unlikely to consider buying a new car from an automaker in bankruptcy; 64 percent were very unlikely. Further, more than eight in 10 respondents said they are unlikely to consider buying a new car from a division that is being sold or phased out; 63 percent said very unlikely. </p>

<p>To counter this problem, President Obama announced this morning that the federal government will back their car warranties, in an effort to bolster consumer confidence.</p>

<p>The program will involve a separate account that will be funded with cash contributed by the manufacturer and a loan from the U.S. government to pay for repairs covered by the manufacturer’s warranty on each new vehicle. More details on the announcement are available in a NY Times <a href="http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/30/understanding-obamas-auto-warranty-plan/">article</a> by Chris Jensen.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Major RV Manufacturers File Bankruptcy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/03/major_rv_manufacturers_file_ba_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=40363" title="Major RV Manufacturers File Bankruptcy" />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.40363</id>
    
    <published>2009-03-16T05:43:03Z</published>
    <updated>2009-03-18T03:58:25Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Fleetwood Motor Homes filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 10, 2009. Fleetwood, a leading RV manufacturer in terms of sales, announced it would continue operations while it reorganized. Fleetwood said it would close its travel trailer operation. Fleetwood joins Monaco...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Fleetwood Motor Homes filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 10, 2009. Fleetwood, a leading RV manufacturer in terms of sales, announced it would continue operations while it reorganized. Fleetwood said it would close its travel trailer operation. Fleetwood joins Monaco Coach Corp and Country Coach in the bankruptcy courts. Other RV manufacturers such as Weekend Warrior, Western RV, Alfa Leisure, and Teton Homes have simply closed down. Coachman went out having sold its assets to Forest River. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Consumer Reports on the Best New Cars &amp; Trucks</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/02/consumer_reports_on_the_best_n_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=39075" title="Consumer Reports on the Best New Cars &amp; Trucks" />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.39075</id>
    
    <published>2009-03-01T00:31:54Z</published>
    <updated>2009-03-01T00:43:32Z</updated>
    
    <summary>To the surprise of no one, Consumer Reports picks Honda and Toyota as the most manufacturers with the most reliable and highly rated cars and trucks. Subaru also scored well. Although GM and Ford have some highly rated models, overall...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>To the surprise of no one, <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/new-cars/index.htm">Consumer Reports</a> picks Honda and Toyota as the most manufacturers with the most reliable and highly rated cars and trucks. Subaru also scored well. Although GM and Ford have some highly rated models, overall the U.S. auto makers get poor grades. Chrysler ranks at the bottom with no recommended models.</p>

<p>CR's graph tells the story:</p>

<p><img alt="best-cars-compare.jpg" src="http://www.lemonlaws.com/best-cars-compare.jpg" width="500" height="484" /<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Auto Makers Charge Extra for Safety Features</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/02/auto_makers_charge_extra_for_s.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=38510" title="Auto Makers Charge Extra for Safety Features" />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.38510</id>
    
    <published>2009-02-22T18:19:31Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-22T18:36:31Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Side air bags and electronic stability control are two of the most effective safety features available on new cars. The good news is that the federal safety agency is requiring auto makers to equip cars with side air bags by...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Auto Safety" />
            <category term="Buying New Cars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Side air bags and electronic stability control are two of the most effective safety features available on new cars. The good news is that the federal safety agency is requiring auto makers to equip cars with side air bags by the 2010 model year and stability control by the 2012 model year.</p>

<p>The bad news is that buyers must buy expensive additional option packages, or even a more expensive model, to get these features. As reported by Cheryl Jensen in February 20, 2009, edition of the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/22/automobiles/22OPTIONS.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=cheryl%20jensen&st=cse">NY Times</a>, a person buying a 2008 Nissan Altima 4-cylinder car would have to move up to the V-6 and buy the technology package for an added cost of $5,000 to $6,000.</p>

<p>Ms Jensen points out that even Honda, a leader in car safety, does not offer stability control on the basic 2009 Honda Fit and Insight models. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Will GM &amp; Chrysler Honor Warranties in Bankruptcy?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/02/will_gm_chrysler_honor_warrant_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=38482" title="Will GM &amp; Chrysler Honor Warranties in Bankruptcy?" />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.38482</id>
    
    <published>2009-02-22T00:54:42Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-22T01:04:17Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Writing in the NY Times auto blog, Chris Jensen explores whether GM and Chrysler will honor new-car warranties if they file Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The bankruptcy experts agree the companies would not have to do so and theoretically creditors could...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Writing in the NY Times auto blog, Chris Jensen explores whether GM and Chrysler will honor new-car warranties if they file Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The bankruptcy experts agree the companies would not have to do so and theoretically creditors could object to being disfavored. However, creditors and the bankruptcy judges would realize that honoring warranties is critical to maintaining customer goodwill and hence the warranties would be honored.</p>

<p>GM's warranty costs were $4.5 billion in 2007 so clearly a lot of money is at stake.</p>

<p>GM has said it will always honor its warranties forever. GM has said it will honor Saab warranties post its recent bankruptcy filing in a Swedish court. Chrysler states it is committed to serving its customers.</p>

<p>    </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>How Car Talk Selects its Callers</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/02/how_car_talk_selects_its_calle.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=38217" title="How Car Talk Selects its Callers" />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.38217</id>
    
    <published>2009-02-19T05:07:42Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-19T05:37:43Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The NPR program Car Talk with Tom and Ray Magliozzi, aka Click and Clack, is the most popular car show on the radio. Ever wonder how you get through to talk about your car? It is not a matter of...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Detecting Auto Defects" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The NPR program Car Talk with Tom and Ray Magliozzi, aka Click and Clack, is the most popular car show on the radio. Ever wonder how you get through to talk about your car? It is not a matter of just calling 1-888-227-8255 and waiting to get connected to hosts according to a Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/wsjgate?subURI=%2Farticle%2FSB123482719275095127-email.html&nonsubURI=%2Farticle_email%2FSB123482719275095127-lMyQjAxMDI5MzE0ODgxMjg3Wj.html">article</a> in its February 18, 2009, edition.</p>

<p>About 10,000 people call in to Car Talk's answering machines every day. Some 1,000 callers manage to leave messages. Interns screen the messages and a  producer makes follow-up calls to about 25 persons. The producer looks for a dozen articulate folks with a sense of humor and an interesting, current car problem that is straight forward enough to be discussed on the air. They also look for diverse "voices," (urban, rural, young, old, male, female) and an assortment of issues.</p>

<p>Contrary to some rumors, the brother do not have advance information on the callers or their car problems. The Car Talk website is www.cartalk.com.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>National Database of Wrecked Vehicles Available January 30, 2009</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/2009/01/national_database_of_wrecked_v_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lemonlaws.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=36264" title="National Database of Wrecked Vehicles Available January 30, 2009" />
    <id>tag:www.lemonlaws.com,2009://40.36264</id>
    
    <published>2009-01-30T00:41:31Z</published>
    <updated>2009-01-30T00:53:48Z</updated>
    
    <summary>On January 30, 2009, the federal safety agency will make available a national database on stolen and totaled (salvage) vehicles. Consumers may go to www.nmvtis.gov for information on how to use the system. At this time, the database has information...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mark F. Anderson</name>
        <uri>http://www.kabolaw.com/mark_f_anderson.asp</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Buying Used Cars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lemonlaws.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>On January 30, 2009, the federal safety agency will make available a national database on stolen and totaled (salvage) vehicles. Consumers may go to www.nmvtis.gov for information on how to use the system. At this time, the database has information from only 27 states that cover 73% of U.S. vehicles. A federal law requires all states to participate by 2010. </p>

<p>Starting March 30, 2009, salvage yards, junk yards, and insurance companies must provide information on junked cars for inclusion in the database.</p>

<p>Shamefully, California, New York and Pennslyvania officials are balking at participating. Observers say it may be because those states get revenue from supplying vehicle information to private databases (presumably Carfax and AutoCheck). Presumably this will get worked out in time.</p>

<p>Three consumer advocacy groups had to sue the U.S. Department of Justice to get this done. Rosemary Shahan of Citizens for Auto Reliability and Safety led the way. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

